Kerr UniversityClincal StudiesVideo Library3rd Party DataOnline Dental Educationimageimageimageimage

SonicFill 3rd Party Data


Viscosity change of SonicFill when subjected to sonic vibration


Viscosity Change

Sonic activation provided by the SonicFill handpiece applies shear stress to the composite, which in turn reduces its viscosity. While all composite materials display some reduction in viscosity upon exposure to shear stress, the unique formulation of SonicFill allows for a substantial viscosity drop – almost three times greater than traditional composites such as Premise.

In addition, SonicFill displays a more gradual viscosity buildup compared to traditional composites once the shear stress is removed, briefly retaining its flowable characteristics to enable excellent adaptation, followed by a gradual viscosity increase yielding an easily sculptable, nonslumping material.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in combination with SonicFill (Kerr) in Class I cavities


Marginal Adaptation of SonicFill and Composite/Adhesive Systems

SonicFill composite placed in one bulk increment has excellent margin adaptation utilizing either a etch&rinse or self etch adhesive. SonicFill has superior marginal integrity than both Filtek Supreme Plus and Tetric Evo Ceram placed in 2 mm increments. Since both Filtek Supreme Plus and Tetric Evo Ceram have been in use for several years, it can be concluded that restorations bulk filled with SonicFill composite will have long term clinical success.

SonicFill Mechanical Properties


Flexural Strength (MPa)

Flexural Modulus (GPa)

Compressive Strength (MPa)

Volumteric Shrinkage

SonicFill showed the highest flexural strength of all materials tested. Both the flexural modulus and compressive strength of SonicFill are comparable or superior to most of the composite materials evaluated. These properties strongly support that SonicFill can withstand high posterior occlusal forces. Furthermore, SonicFill, along with Premise, displayed the lowest volumetric shrinkage of all materials examined making it well suited for bulk placement.

SonicFill Flexural Strength


Flexural Strength (MPa)

SonicFill restorative composite showed the highest flexural strength of all materials tested. A high flexural strength suggests that the restoration will not deform and degrade even in a high-stress environment such as a posterior restoration.

SonicFill Volumetric Shrinkage


Volumetric Shrinkage

The volumetric shrinkage of SonicFill is significantly less than most traditional composite materials. Most notably, two products recommended for bulk filling—SureFil SDR and Quixx—have a higher volumetric shrinkage than SonicFill. Low volumetric shrinkage reduces the likelihood of the composite pulling away from the tooth surface during the polymerization process, thus reducing the potential for microleakage and marginal staining.

SonicFill Compressive Strength


Compressive Strength(MPa)

The compressive strength of SonicFill composite is higher than most of the restorative materials evaluated in this study. Consequently, SonicFill will withstand typical posterior occlusal forces resulting in durable, long-lasting restorations.

SonicFill Portfolio of Scientific Research PDF



Related Products


Product Images
SonicFil Sonic-Activated Bulk Fill Composite

SonicFil Sonic-Activated Bulk Fill Composite



Kerr Products