The best solution: One more overlay.

December 17, 2025

|

The step-luting technique optimizes the cementation of indirect


restorations using dual-cure resin cement, addressing a critical


phase in restorative procedures. A 5-second light cure stabilizes


the restoration while maintaining the cement in a gel-like state for easy


excess removal. After a 20-second wait, a final 40-second light cure ensures


complete polymerization, enhancing bond strength and marginal adaptation.


The self-curing component guarantees polymerization even in areas with


limited light exposure. This technique improves clinical efficiency, reduces


stress on the restoration, and ensures long-term stability.


The following clinical case demonstrates the step-by-step fabrication and


cementation of an overlay on an endodontically treated molar with a faulty


composite restoration.




Fig. 1 - Initial situation. The patient showed an old


unaesthetic composite reconstruction with several


cracks on lower first molar. With the compliance of the


patient, the treatment plan involved the replacement of


the existing composite restoration with an indirect one.



Fig. 2 - Guide for occlusal reduction. A cross was


created to serve as a guide for occlusal reduction and


the subsequent preparation for an overlay, utilizing a


diamond cylindrical bur. It is preferable to initiate the


preparation in the central fossa, progressing along the


sulcus in order to achieve an even 2 mm of occlusal


reduction in the deepest part.secured with ligatures.



Fig. 3 - Preparation steps. First reducing the occlusal


surface, followed by the interproximal areas.



Fig. 4 - Finalized tooth preparation. Finalized tooth


preparation with a smooth, rounded surface, free of


interproximal boxes and sharp angles.


Clinical Case


Close-up of a blue plastic mold<br />
<br />
AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Fig. 5 - Conventional impression taking.



Fig. 6 - Provisional placement. For the provisional


restoration, Telio material was applied to cover and


protect the preparation while awaiting the fabrication of


the definitive indirect restoration. It is essential to verify


stability and occlusion before dismissing the patient.



Fig. 7 - Fabrication of the indirect restoration.



Fig. 8 - Rubber dam placement. Following provisional


removal, the rubber dam was applied to initiate the


cementation of the indirect restoration.



Fig. 9 - Air abrasion. The tooth was air-abraded to clean


the surface using AcquaCare (Velopex International)


with 50 μm aluminum oxide, following the Style Italiano


protocol.



Fig. 10 - Etching. The indirect restoration was


conditioned according to protocol. First, 9%


hydrofluoric acid was applied for 20 seconds and


then rinsed off. In addition, to ensure a clean intaglio


surface and remove residues, additional etching was


performed with 37% phosphoric acid for one minute.


Silane was then applied with a brush and air-dried to


facilitate alcohol evaporation.



Fig. 11 - Bonding. OptiBond Universal (Kerr) was applied


into two layers on both the onlay intaglio surface and the


tooth preparation with thorough rubbing and scrubbing.


This was followed by air-blowing for 20 seconds.



Fig. 12 - Cementation. After that, NX3 Nexus Third


Generation (Kerr) luting cement was applied, and the


onlay was immediately set onto the tooth.



Fig. 13 - Step curing technique. The ‘step curing’


technique allows for the controlled removal of excess


material while it is still soft, making it easier to clean up


the margins. Initially, the resin cement was light-cured for


about 5 seconds to slightly harden the material, allowing


the clinician to easily remove the soft excess around the


margins of the restoration using a fine instrument (LMFissura,


LM-Arte).



Fig. 14 - Removal of the excess. Using the Eccesso


instrument from the LM-Arte kit and dental floss, it is


possible to easily remove excess cement before it fully


hardens. This approach ensures a safe and efficient


cleanup of the restoration margins.


Close-up of a dental treatment<br />
<br />
AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Fig. 15 - Final polymerization. After cleaning up the


excess material, a glycerine was applied to ensure a


complete degree of conversion of the resin cement


material. Thus, the final polymerization was completed


with an additional 40 seconds of light-curing.


A close-up of a dental tool<br />
<br />
AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Fig. 16 - Polishing. The restoration-tooth interface was


carefully polished using a brown rubber polisher to


enhance both the aesthetic outcome and the properties


of the resin cement.



Fig. 17 - Occlusal adjustment. Once the rubber dam was


removed, occlusal adjustments were carefully verified to


ensure proper stability and function.


A close-up of teeth<br />
<br />
AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Fig. 18 - Radiographic examination. First lower molar


radiographic examination, before and after.


Conclusion


The successful outcome of this clinical case highlights


the importance of proper preparation design and precise


cementation protocols in ensuring the longevity and


functionality of the restoration. The step-luting technique,


combined with the use of a dual-cure resin cement,


allowed for controlled polymerization, optimizing bond


strength and marginal adaptation. Additionally, careful


occlusal adjustments and stability verification were


essential to achieving a predictable and durable result.


This approach simplifies the cementation phase,


minimizing stress on the restoration while enhancing


clinical efficiency.


Bibliography


1. Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G, Sabbatini S, Conti C, Özcan M, Putignano A, Orsini G. Comparison of two curing protocols


during adhesive cementation: can the step luting technique supersede the traditional one? Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):433-


439. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00558-0. Epub 2020 Oct 31. PMID: 33128650; PMCID: PMC7954706.


2. da Veiga AMA, Cunha AC, Ferreira DMTP, da Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, et al. Longevity of direct and indirect resin


composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1–12.


3. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth.


A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12–21.


MKT-25-0236 Rev-0


Disclosure: Prof. Angelo Putignano is a consultant for Kerr. The opinions and technique expressed in this article are based on


the experience of Prof. Angelo Putignano. Kerr is a medical device manufacturer and does not dispense medical advice.


Clinicians should use their own professional judgment in treating their patients. All trademarks and brand names are the property


of their respective owners.


Prof. Angelo Putignano

Written By:

Prof. Angelo Putignano

Professor/DDS

Share This

Want to learn more? Let us know more about you and we will get back to you.